The Indian Evidence Act, originally passed in India by the Imperial Legislative Council in , during the British Raj, contains a set of rules and allied issues. THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT in India Bare Acts, Banking and Insurance, Business and Corporate, Constitutional, Consumer Laws, Criminal Law, Energy, . Indian Evidence Act, (Act no. 1 of ) Act requires in oral evidence that person who has actually perceived something by that sense by which it is.

Author: Yozshular Tura
Country: Guadeloupe
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: History
Published (Last): 17 March 2005
Pages: 234
PDF File Size: 16.90 Mb
ePub File Size: 18.70 Mb
ISBN: 295-9-68454-134-3
Downloads: 80740
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Sahn

In criminal cases previous good character relevant. Order of production and examination of witnesses. Section92 – Exclusion of evidence of oral agreement.

Indian Evidence Act – Wikipedia

Proof of facts by oral evidence. Would you like to tell us about a lower price?

Proof as to digital signature. Section82 – Presumption as to document admissible in England without proof of seal or signature.

This section does not cite any sources. Section84 – Presumption as to collections of laws and reports of decisions.

Section23 – Admissions in civil cases, when relevant. Questions intended to insult or annoy. There are two chapters under this part: Section18 – Admission by party to proceeding or his agent by suitor in representative character. Evidence may be given of facts aact issue and relevant facts. Birth during marriage, conclusive proof of legitimacy.

Section7 – Facts which are the occasion, cause or effect of facts in issue. Impeaching credit of witness.

Indian Evidence Act

Part 1 deals with relevancy of the facts. Estoppel of acceptor of bill of exchange, bailee or licensee. Referring to the observation made by Sir John Woodroffe in his Commentary on the Evidence Act Editionwhere the view had been expressed that judgments and decrees were not admissible under section 13, their Lordships pointed out that this view was not in accordance with the decisions of the Board in Ram Ranjan’s case 3 and Dino Mony’s case.


Entries in books of account when relevant. I am happy to note that you agree with the suggestion which I have been repeatedly making for some time past that the Commission’s reports should be printed as early as possible and circulated to all academic bodies like the Bar Associations in the whole of India, the Judges of the Supreme Court and the High Courts, the Bar Council of India and the State Bar Councils, and other institutions ,interested in the study of law.

Indian Evidence Act, | Bare Acts | Law Library | AdvocateKhoj

Customers who viewed this item also viewed. Of course, setting up the machinery and recommending necessary reform thereof may not, by themselves, meet the purpose we have in view; much would, inevitably depend upon the members of the judiciary whose privilege it is to interpret and administer the provisions enshrined in the Act. Opinion as to digital signature where relevant. Burden of proof as to ownership. Section22A – When oral admission as to contents of electronic records are relevant.

Section – Indecent and scandalous questions. Rules as to notice to produce.

Admissions by persons whose position must be proved as against party to suit. Nevertheless, with the passage of time, it has been disclosed that there has been a difference of judicial opinion on some relevant and important points and, in making its recommendations, the Commission has taken adt consideration this aspect of the matter.


Section65B – Admissibility of electronic records. The police officer shall then certify on the statement itself indiaj he has done. After a careful study of the true juristic position in this matter, the Commission has recommended solutions which, it is hoped, attempt to state the position in a clear, compact and easily intelligible manner.

Cases in which statement of relevant fact by person who is dead or cannot be found, etc, is relevant. This is not necessary under clause 5.


Here’s how terms and conditions apply. Section90 – Presumption as to documents thirty years old. Section – When witness to be compelled to answer. Confession otherwise gare not to become irrelevant because of promise of secrecy, etc. Presumption as to dowry death. Section – Questions intended to insult or annoy. It may, incidentally, be noted that in neither of the two cases before the Supreme Court, the decisions of the Privy Council or any other case on this point was discussed.